Abcarian: The queen is dead, a country mourns, yet poor Meghan Markle still can’t catch a break

Meghan Markle meets with members of the public outside Windsor Castle on Saturday to view flowers left in tribute to the Queen. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

Queen Elizabeth II’s death has brought forth all kinds of emotions: grief and sadness at the passing of a still and comforting presence, respect and awe for her steady hand and sense of duty, and righteous anger at the lasting effects. The often violent subjugation of millions of people around the world of the British Empire.

And then there’s a side of the gossip speculation that accompanies any big news about the royal family: whether Charles will be able to earn the love and respect of his subjects, especially his cowardice with his first wife, Princess Diana. After behaving in a manner?

How will the public react to the appearance at various funeral ceremonies of the late Jeffrey Epstein’s friend, the disgraced Prince Andrew, who settled a lawsuit with a woman who insists he sexually abused her when she was a minor?

Will Princess William and Harry settle their differences? Will rail-thin Kate, the new Princess of Wales, ever eat a cheeseburger?

And, good heavens, why is there so much hate on Meghan Markle?

I was particularly curious how Harry and Meghan’s return to the royal fold would be, since their decision to step back from royal duties in early 2020 and move to the colonies – well, Montecito – has been one of such a stumbling block in Britain. landed with thud

I couldn’t think of a single reason to blame them for leaving. Harry, who had lost his mother to the insatiable demands of the tabloid press, wisely decided that he could not in good conscience put his family under the same pressure.

It was a smart move for Oprah Winfrey to spill her guts in a television special last year. More than 17 million people tuned in as the couple spoke openly about the stresses of living in public glare, much of it hostile, and the lack of emotional support from the palace, especially for Meghan, who herself Said to be reminiscent of a depression. of Diana.

The interview was a huge hit in the United States and served as a declaration of independence for Harry and Meghan that was very divisive in England. The pair insisted that the royal family was racist – or, at least, a family member says speculation about the color of their unborn child’s skin was made during Meghan’s first pregnancy.

“what passed Did they?” shouted the Daily Mail.

On Saturday, Meghan and Harry joined William and Kate at the gates of Windsor Castle to watch the mass of flowers left as a tribute to the Queen. It was the first time in more than two years that the couple had been seen together in public.

Apparently, some mourners were not happy to see Meghan. A video of some women deliberately ignoring him or looking away from him as he held his hand.

At the same time, the Twitter hashtag #GoHomeMeghanMarkle was trending.

“At the end of the day she is causing even more pain to a grieving family,” One critic tweeted. “Anybody will go home with decency. That’s not needed or wanted.”

“We don’t need a self-serving American actress pretending she’s upset by the passing of our Queen,” Wrote another.

I suspect that much of the disrespect was spontaneous.

Twitter analytics firm Bot Sentinel has documented a well-organized internet campaign against Meghan. According to New York magazine’s Cut, Bot Sentinel found that 70% of hateful posts about Meghan originated from just 83 Twitter accounts, with an estimated collective potential reach of up to 17 million users.

It’s not clear exactly who owns the accounts or why Meghan is the victim of so much trolling, but I’ll bet my money on garden-variety racism.

Something about royal couplets—especially when an English king or prince marries a divorced American layman, then flees the country—really stirs our imaginations, doesn’t it?

The story of King Edward VIII—who abdicated the monarchy to be with Wallis Simpson, whom he described as “the woman I love”—shocked a nation, if not the world. To renounce a kingdom, and for what? He spent his life in Paris in isolated, hedonistic splendor, throwing parties, dressed lavishly and doing nothing important to the world.

The story of Harry and Meghan is far more inspiring. Here’s a modern, fully formed, fraternal woman with a successful real-life career, political opinion, and an enviable ease in public settings, marrying into a white family of kicks and screams in the modern age.

It didn’t take long for Meghan’s side to develop from disastrous to disastrous, in fact—for the famous ravens tabloid press on both sides of the Atlantic. Coverage in the UK was particularly brutal.

Once the honeymoon ended, a new narrative began to take hold: Meghan was selfish, exuberant, greedy, demanding and cruel.

In January 2020, less than two years after Harry and Meghan’s wedding took place in a feel-good ceremony for millions of people around the world, BuzzFeed reported a much-talked-about story comparing headlines about Meghan and Kate Middleton. Published, as the Princess of Wales was once known. The hostility towards Meghan was surprising.

From the Daily News: “Kate tenderly caresses her stomach.” “Why can’t Meghan Markle keep her hands off her bump?”

From the Express: “Kate’s morning sickness cure? Prince William gifts avocado to pregnant Duchess.” “Meghan Markle’s beloved avocado linked to human rights abuse and dry, millennial shame.”

Harry and Meghan are laughing for the last time these days. She’s reportedly struck a rich deal with Netflix, and has just launched a podcast, “Archtypes,” in which she interviews women about their challenges and the stigma they face.

In an episode titled “The Stigma of the Singleton with Mindy Kaling,” Meghan took issue with the subject of comments directed at her after getting engaged.

“Everyone was like, ‘Oh my god, you’re so lucky, he chose you.’ … But, thankfully, I have a partner who was contradicting that narrative for me and going, ‘They’ve done this all wrong. I’m lucky because you’ve chosen me.'”

It’s good to see that despite the relentless attacks on her character, Meghan’s self-esteem remains intact. Maybe it drives her critics crazy.


This story originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times.

Source link